| 
ENS NEWS N° 45: Learning the lessons of RioI  was recently in Budapest for an international nuclear conference that was  attended by senior government and EU officials, representatives of the nuclear  industry and other stakeholders. It focused on the current state and future  direction of the nuclear industry in Europe, on EU energy policy in general –  and nuclear in particular – and on the latest reactor technology in support of  global new build. The importance of the agenda and the stature of the speakers  present, which included ENS Secretary General, Jean-Pol Poncelet, were matched  only by the keen interest shown by delegates in a global phenomenon that is  currently sweeping the world. No, it’s not nuclear new build, but a sporting  event that generates commercial and media interest of gigantic proportions; an  event that fires the imagination, stirs the passion and involves sums of money that  make your eyes water.                  Well, unless you have spent the past couple of weeks on a  penal colony on Venus, you can’t have failed to notice that the 2014 FIFA Football  World Cup has been monopolising the world’s TV channels, dominating the media  and preoccupying the waking hours of millions of football addicts around the  world. I am reliably informed that this sporting extravaganza, with its iconic  pictures of the Copacabana Beach, the Sugar Loaf Mountain and the Corcovado, is  even popular with people who don’t usually follow football. Well, whether the  World Cup is a passion for you, or whether you prefer to watch grass grow – yes,  believe it or not there are people who are not gripped by football fever – you  cannot deny that this mega event has to a large extent taken over the collective  consciousness of the planet.  Marx  famously remarked that ‘religion is the opium of the people.’ Well, he never  got to see the World Cup.                  You could be forgiven, in all the media frenzy surrounding  the competition, for temporarily losing sight of the importance of the recent  European Parliament elections and the nomination of a new EC President. Voter  apathy and a general lack of interest in the Machiavellian arts made sure that  the latter event was never likely to compete with the former, at least for a  majority of European citizens. To be fair, what chance did the new Assembly  have to really make its presence felt when the eyes of the world were firmly  fixed on Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paolo and Belo Horizonte? If truth be told, many  MEPs are probably at least as interested in watching the matches on a giant  screen as they are in campaigning for election to a committee or getting to  know their new electorate.                 And yet these political events cannot be dismissed as mere  bagatelles. Indeed, they may well have an impact, subtle or otherwise, on the  future direction of nuclear energy policy, or on how funding and support for  research is allocated and managed. We shall see. Will a new ITRE (Industry  Research and Energy) Committee in the European Parliament pursue a slightly  different agenda to that of its predecessor? Who will be the next Research  Commissioner, and what are likely to be his or her priorities? These are  legitimate questions. Of course, the change might be minimal. But, long after  the memory of the great goals and inept refereeing performances has faded away,  and we have been weaned off the drug of football, even a small degree of political  change could influence the framework within which the nuclear science community  will be expected to work in the future.                   I was amazed and amused during the conference in Budapest to  see how many speakers suddenly started using footballing analogies and  expressions in their presentations. They really grabbed participants’  attention. This new populist vernacular was a godsend for emphasising points and  highlighting issues with a splash of colour and humour. All of a sudden, utilities  were told to ‘keep their eyes on the ball’. Governments were urged to create ‘a  level playing field’ for nuclear, to avoid ‘scoring an own goal’ by failing to  acknowledge its many virtues.  ‘Defence  in depth’ became a principle shared not only by nuclear power plants, but also  by well organised defensive-minded teams. The conference was a great success,  thanks largely to the quality of speakers and diversity of the programme. Rather  than being a distraction, the World Cup actually added something to the  proceedings; something that it was difficult to quantify or define, but something  tangible none the less.                  As the participants left at the end of the conference to  catch their planes home or to book a place in the local pub for the next round  of matches, I couldn’t help being struck by how much something can unite  people, trigger emotion and involvement and focus the mind. Ironically, nuclear  energy only tends to provoke such an emotional response, or such blind devotion  among those who already oppose it.  Perhaps  there is something we can learn from this global football festival when it  comes to speaking to people on their terms, in a language that is universal, comprehensible,  appealing and relevant to their lives. Using emotion to articulate key messages  is not a skill that the nuclear community is particularly renowned for, but surely  it’s never too late to learn new skills? 
                
                  |  Mark O’Donovan
 Editor-in-Chief, ENS NEWS
 |   |  
 |