European
Nuclear Society
e-news
Issue 9 Summer 2005
http://www.euronuclear.org/e-news/e-news-9/newsfromgerman.htm
|
Wolf-Dieter Krebs
|
Energy policy has moved back into the center of the political
debate in Germany. The composition of the future energy mix is one of the current
key topics. The parties supporting the present federal government in Berlin
(Socialdemocrats and Greens) heavily lost the last state election in Northrhine-Westphalia
in May. In a feeling of resignation Chancellor Schröder is now going for
early federal elections this fall, a year earlier than normal. This is quite
abnormal for Germany due to constitutional restraints.
The emerging overwhelming election campaign issues are economic slow-down (almost
stagnation) and resulting high unemployment rates in the order of 10 percent
as well as the reasons for them. High energy, especially electricity prices
are strongly claimed by the electricity consuming industry as a major competitive
disadvantage. Electricity intensive industries like aluminum smelting plants
and basic chemistry are already shifting production abroad. The massive expansion
of renewable energies and energy tax increases have more than eaten up the price
decrease due to market liberalization. The phase-out of nuclear power as presently
fixed by law will de facto start during the next legislative period, only the
350 MWe Obrigheim NPP has been shut down in May 2005.
|
|
The present opposition parties are calling for life extension of the 17 operating NPP and an economically reasonable further support of renewables. A debate on new nuclear power plants is mostly avoided for the time being. But there is a strong demand for immediate completion of the exploration in the Gorleben salt mine for disposal of HAW and for putting into operation the Konrad |
iron ore mine for non heat producing radioactive waste. What is important: This is openly supported by the state government of Lower Saxony where the two sites are located.
The public at large is mentally split. Only a small minority “wants or likes” nuclear power but a majority of the German population is now convinced that the existing NPP will eventually be operated longer than the phase-out agreement states.
The electric utility industry for the time being lives quite well with the phase-out agreement which allows pretty undisturbed operation of the 17 NPP. However the utilities are facing enormous challenges: Up to 40,000 MWe of new generating capacity must be installed in Germany by 2020. Half of this is the nuclear power being phased out, the other half is fossil power generated by ageing plants which will need to be replaced. In addition a significant upgrade of the high voltage grid will be needed in order to transmit wind power generated in northern Germany to the south. This means immense investments and far-reaching decisions. The key parameter in the utility decision-making process is the political boundary conditions. The utilities demand from any new government a clear definition on a long-term basis and a reasonable weighing of the numerous criteria which steer the energy mix into different directions. This goes far beyond any just national assessment. The media and the public increasingly realize that a sensible energy mix can only be defined by a global assessment. No clear decisions will lead to postponed investments and the bill will have to be paid: Not by the utilities or the politicians but by industrial and private electricity consumers and indirectly by the unemployed, i.e. by the whole nation.
For many years KTG has supported common sense thinking: Don’t
put all your eggs in one basket. We need all energy options including nuclear
power and only this low cost base load can earn the money needed to develop
renewable energies into competitiveness.
© European Nuclear Society, 2005
