European Nuclear Society
e-news Issue 19 Winter 2008
http://www.euronuclear.org/e-news/e-news-19/icapp.htm

2006 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants

Embedded International Topical Meeting at the 2006 ANS Annual Meeting

ICAPP '06 • June 4-8, 2006 • Reno, NV • Reno Hilton
University of Florida

Dryout of BWR Fuel Elements

Frigyes Reisch Nuclear Power Safety, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Phone/fax +46 8 7202365
Frigyes@safety.sci.kth.se

1. INTRODUCTION

The surface temperature of the fuel limits the power production of nuclear reactors. Intense high temperatures can damage the fuel cladding and cause a radioactive release and even provoke in-vessel accident resulting in particulate debris bed, or core melt down. Therefore, identifying the uppermost permitted surface temperature in a Light Water Reactor (LWR) is of great importance. The experiments described here define the maximum permissible power production of Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) fuel element without the risk of burnout. As witnessed by a great number of publications, the search is going on for reliable criteria to assure the safety of the fuel. Here one such criteria is analysed. Normally the fuel surface is effectively cooled by boiling water. However, when the heat flux exceeds a critical value the heat transfer from the fuel surface into the coolant deteriorates, with the result that a drastically increased fuel surface temperature occurs. Excessive fuel temperature can be caused by overpower or reduced coolant flow. At neutronics and thermal-hydraulic power oscillations when the duration of the power peaks are very short, temporary high temperature can occur without causing fuel failures as normal cooling can quickly recover. To avoid excessive fuel temperature, the knowledge of the onset of the overheating phenomena is absolutely necessary, both at the design stage and during the safe operation of a reactor. There are complex correlations especially developed for specific fuel bundle designs. These correlations contains surface power, mass flow, system pressure and other parameters. While analyzing the test results it was recognised that a single parameter, the void, characterises the onset of the overheating phenomena in a wide range of pressure and flow conditions. These results were attained from the experimental loop especially developed to study the dryout of BWR fuel elements.

2. MECHANISMS OF CRITICAL HEAT FLUX

Normally the fuel surface is effectively cooled by boiling water. However, if the heat flux exceeds a critical value the heat transfer from the fuel surface into the coolant that deteriorats, with the result a drastically increased fuel surface temperature occurs. The mechanisms of critical heat flux are:

a) Formation of hot spots under a growing bubble. Here when a bubble grows at the heated wall a dry patch forms underneath the bubble as the micro-layer of liquid under the bubble evaporates. In this dry zone, the wall temperature rises due to the deterioration in heat transfer.

b) Near-wall bubble crowding and inhibition of vapor release. Here a “bubble boundary layer” builds up on the surface and vapor generated by boiling on the surface must escape through this boundary layer. When the boundary layer becomes too crowded with bubbles, vapor escape is impossible and liquid cannot penetrate to the heated wall and cool it, the surface becomes dry and overheat gives rise to burnout.

c) Dryout under a slug or vapor clot. In plug or slug flow, the thin film surrounding the large bubble may dry out giving rise to localized overheating and hence burnout. Alternatively, a stationary vapor slug may be formed on the wall with a thin film of liquid separating it from the wall, in this case, localized drying out of this film gives rise to overheating and burn out.

d) Film dryout in annular flow

Figure 1. Critical Heat Flux Mechanisms

3. EXCESSIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE

Excessive fuel temperature can be caused by overpower or by reduced coolant flow. At thermal power and/or hydraulic oscillations when the power peaks and/or the flow reductions are very short and few, temporary over temperature (above the designed limit) can occur without causing fuel failures as normal cooling can quickly recover. To avoid excessive fuel temperature, which can cause damage to the fuel, knowledge of the onset of the over heating phenomena is absolutely necessary, both at the design stage and during the safe operation of a reactor. There are complex correlations especially developed for specific fuel bundle designs. These correlations contain surface power, mass flow, system pressure and other parameters. While analyzing the test results for a single fuel pin in water and steam in an annular test section, it was recognized that a single parameter, the void, is characterizing the onset of the overheating phenomena regardless which critical heat flux mechanism occurred.

4. MEASUREMENTS

Measurements were been carried out in a two-phase flow test loop consisting of two heated concentric tubes, the central one representing a fuel rod while the outer pipe emanates the heating power corresponding to the surrounding fuel rods in a reactor core. This loop with an anular test section height of 7 m is presently located at the Division of Nuclear Engineering, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, in Stockholm and has been in operation for some thirty years first at the Studsvik research establishment and then at KTH to simulate thermal hydraulic conditions in Boiling Water Reactors. (Figure 2)

Total Power: 1 MW
Total mass flow rate: 1 kg/s
Max pressure: 25 Mpa.
Max lengt of the test section: 7m.

Figure 2. The loop and the test section

5. TEST RESULTS

The results of these tests were studied to investigate the occurrence of the onset of the excessive temperature on the surface of the inner and outer test tubes in this annular flow system. The tests covered pressures of 30, 50 and 70 bar; sub-cooling 10ºC and 40ºC; mass velocities between 250 and 2250 kg/m²s and a total input power up to 580 kW, in this case with uniform power distribution. The tests have been repeatedly performed in an annular test section with a single fuel rod furnished with pin spacers, and 7 and 6 grid spacers alternatively. Then the test results were evaluated. To calculate the steam quality, the continuity, the heat and mass balance equations were applied.

The Continuity Equations

Heat balance

Qtotal input = Qsubcooling to saturation + Qsteam building (1)

Q heat

Qsubcooling to saturation heat used to increase the temperature of the subcooled water to saturation temperature

Qsteam building heat used for vaporization of part of the saturated water to steam

Mass balance

Winlet water = Wexit water + Wexit steam (2)

W mass flow

The general definition of steam quality, sometimes called steam value is:

x = Wsteam / ( Wwater + Wsteam) (3)

To calculate the void three known slip correlations; Kirilov, Thoms and Zivi were used. The authors reached different results indeed, however this does not influence the conclusions of this paper. (Figure 3).

Figure3. Comparison between different void correlations as a function of steam quality

The most important result is, that at the onset of the excessive surface temperature the void value changes merely between 0.88 to 0.99, while the steam quality changes in a wide range from 0.45 to 0.75 (Figure 4)

 

Figure 4. Void and Steam Quality as a Function of Mass-Flow at the Onset of the Abrupt Surface Temperature Increase

There has been knowledge of this, however - according to this author’s but this has not been explicitly outlined. This helps to focus on the void when planning further test loop experiments, as well as when monitoring the safety of operating reactors and when designing new fuel assemblies. By using the constraitns described here -limiting the permissible void content - damage of the fuel can be avoided.

6. AVOIDING EXCESSIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE

The awareness of this result helps the design of a tool to avoid excessive fuel surface temperature and clad failure in operating reactors. To monitor the void during operation is presently not feasible, however from the measured parameters, power, power distribution, coolant flow, pressure etc. the steam quality everywhere in the core can be calculated continuously and the void can be deduced using steam quality versus void correlation derived from loop experiments. It is interesting to note that an analytical model is described in the literature. The mathematics is applied for a Freon loop and the deduced figures coincide with the measurements from the experimental loop mentioned above. The results are summarized in Figure 5. The abrupt increase of the temperature here too occurs when the void value reaches around 90% for a wide range of subcooling.

Figure 5. Prediction of critical heat flux for Freon at p=1.5 bars, q ”= 190 kW/m² at constant liquid velocity of 0.5 m/

7. CONCLUSIONS

A series of experimental investigations on the maximum permissible power production of Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) and the effect of it on the fuel element’s surface temperature was performed at the test facility located at KTH, Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden. The results show that the “void” is the principal parameter for defining the onset of the excessive surface temperature phenomena leading to burnout of a fuel rod.

© European Nuclear Society, 2008