Providing for Our Energy Future While Protecting
our Environment
A Statement by the International Nuclear Societies
Council
May 2006
To assure the sustainability
and reliability of the world’s long-term energy supply,
the International Nuclear Societies Council (INSC)* calls
upon the G8 Heads of States and Governments to encourage
the deployment of advanced nuclear power stations and pursue
an aggressive |
|
international development program of fast neutron
reactors to assure future long-term uranium supply and efficiently
manage nuclear wastes.
At the Gleneagles meeting, in July 2005, the
Heads of States and Governments of the G8 countries acknowledged
the clear and present danger of climate change due to the release
of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere in the course of human
activities and notably of the burning of fossil fuels, oil, coal
and gas, which today account for 80% of the world’s primary
energy consumption.
Energy is the life-blood of survival and development.
Studies carried out under the auspices of the UN agencies WHO
and UNDP have underlined that without minimal access to energy,
there is no human development, sustainable or not. In 2000, 6
billion inhabitants of planet Earth consumed the energy equivalent
of 10 billion metric tons of oil (10 Gtoe). In 2006, 6.5 billion
people will consume 12 Gtoe, and yet 1.6 billion have no access
to electricity. By 2050, 8 to 9 billion human beings will probably
consume annually between 15 and 18 Gtoe.
Where this energy will come from is an unanswered
question. Fossil fuels, especially oil and gas, even though they
currently provide a dominant fraction of the world’s energy,
are finite resources that even now are showing signs of supply
restrictions and price increases. Furthermore, a policy of continued
dependence on fossil fuels would be unsustainable because of the
negative, possibly disastrous, impact on the environment.
Accommodating the needs and aspirations of a
growing global population, while at the same time cutting by half
the world’s emissions of carbon dioxide, will prove a formidable
challenge - but we must face it or expose mankind to unacceptable
risks. The stakes are huge and the time is now. Only a full array
of measures can meet such a challenge. These measures include:
-
Control the energy demand in the industrialized
and emergent nations by aggressively increasing energy efficiency
and promoting thrifty ways of life;
-
Increase, within the diversified energy mix,
the share of those energy sources that emit very little CO2
during their life cycle, namely nuclear power and renewable
energies, which, together, account today for a mere 10% of
the world energy production (another 10% is supplied by traditional
biomass, the contribution of which is unlikely to increase);.
-
Implement wherever reasonably feasible carbon sequestration
at those facilities which emit large amounts of CO2.
Conservation and renewables are the politically
easy solutions to support. However, nuclear energy, despite the
fact that it now provides 16% of the world’s electricity
cleanly, does not have international support as a way to help
meet our future energy and environmental needs. It is urgent to
realize that, while nuclear, by itself, is not the
solution, there is no realistic solution at all without
nuclear power.
Countries that have the capability to use nuclear
power safely and economically, but have elected to forgo this
use, are actually emitting more CO2 into the environment than
needed, and consuming more fossil fuels than needed. They are
depleting resources and putting pressure on fuel prices, to the
detriment of those poorer and less industrialized countries for
which nuclear power is not yet an option. The INSC calls on those
countries to seriously reconsider their policies and priorities,
to encourage greater development of safe nuclear energy, and to
support strongly the efforts of other governments to do the same.
Today, nuclear power is devoted almost exclusively
to generating electricity. New types of reactor design under development
could open the field to non-electrical applications, notably transportation
through clean production of hydrogen, and desalination. Currently
97% of the energy used for transportation comes from oil.
Today there are several new types of advanced
reactor ready for deployment—designs that have improved
safety and economic performance. In addition, there are smaller
advanced reactors under development that are suited for developing
nations that do not need large nuclear power stations. Should
the deployment of nuclear power stations expand as expected, care
must be taken that its development be sustainable, and not limited
by uranium availability.
Nearly all current power reactors are “thermal”—
they use thermal neutrons, and therefore extract less than 1%
of the energy in the mined uranium. The remainder of the energy
is left unused in the spent fuel and in the depleted uranium that
remains after uranium is enriched for use in thermal reactors.
With known fast-neutron reactor technology, this unutilized energy
can be harvested, thereby extending a hundredfold the energy extracted
from the same amount of mined uranium. Spent fuel from thermal
reactors and depleted uranium from the enrichment process can
be utilized in fast-neutron reactors; the energy that can be extracted
from this alone would be sufficient for several hundred years
without additional mining.
Fast neutron reactors with advanced fuel cycle
facilities also can recycle transuranic elements, thus reducing
significantly the long-lived radioactive waste and therefore facilitating
the acceptability of radwaste disposal sites.
To assure the sustainability and reliability
of the world’s long-term energy supply, the International
Nuclear Societies Council sees an urgent need to deploy safe and
proven thermal-neutron reactors and to commit to an international
program to develop fast neutron reactors and advanced proliferation-resistant
fuel cycle facilities such that the long-term energy contribution
from clean nuclear power can be assured.
INSC MEMBER SOCIETIES
-
American Nuclear Society (ANS)
-
Asociación Argentina de Tecnologia Nuclear (AATN)
-
Associação Brasileira de Energia Nuclear (ABEN)
-
Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ)
-
Australian Nuclear Association (ANA)
-
Canadian Nuclear Society (CaNS)
-
Egyptian Society of Nuclear Science and Applications (ESNSA)
-
European Nuclear Society (ENS)
• Austrian Nuclear Society
• Israel Nuclear Society
• Belgian Nuclear Society
• Italian Nuclear Society
• British Nuclear Energy Society
• Lithuanian Nuclear Energy Association
• Bulgarian Nuclear Society
• Netherlands Nuclear Society
• Croatian Nuclear Society
• Nuclear Society of Russia
• Czech Nuclear Society
• Nuclear Society of Slovenia
• Danish Nuclear Society
• Romanian Nuclear Energy Association
• Finnish Nuclear Society
• Slovak Nuclear Society
• Société Française d’Energie
Nucléaire
• Spanish Nuclear Society
• German Nuclear Society
• Swedish Nuclear Society
• Hungarian Nuclear Society
• Swiss Nuclear Society
-
Indian Nuclear Society (InNS)
-
Israel Nuclear Society (IsNS)
-
Korean Nuclear Society (KNS)
-
Latin American Section (LAS)
-
Nuclear Society of Thailand (NST)
-
Nuclear Energy Society Taipei, China (NEST)
-
Pakistan Nuclear Society (PNS)
-
Sociedad Nuclear Mexicana (SNM)
|