| ENS NEWS, N° 16:
 Intro: The art of communicating scienceWe live in the age of the bit and the bite, of 
                ROM and RAM, of software and hard drive. When we are not busy 
                downloading information, photos or music onto a CD, a DVD, a GSM, 
                or an MP3, we are blogging or texting or surfing. Of course, every 
                age has its own language, with its own vocabulary. Language is, 
                after all, a living thing that is fashioned by evolving social 
                trends and technological developments. When it stops moving you 
                know that it’s doomed. The mass of acronyms and linguistic 
                shortcuts that we use today exemplifies how modern communications 
                have evolved. In particular it reflects our insatiable appetite 
                for receiving and processing ever-increasing amounts of information 
                quickly. This need dictates that brevity, clarity and simplicity 
                are paramount - not style, elegance or impeccable grammar. If 
                our communications are unclear or take too long to get to the 
                point, they are quickly disregarded - in much the same way that 
                a time-constrained editor bins a press release that hasn’t 
                grabbed him by the throat after the first couple of sentences. 
               To those of us brought up on such quaint notions 
                as grammar and punctuation, it’s quite a shock to discover 
                that to communicate successfully we need to speak a language that 
                is rather like fast food - universally available, providing instant 
                gratification and easily digested. Unfortunately, like some fast 
                food, this kind of language is often more about packaging than 
                content and nothing of real substance is communicated. Or is it? Well, whether you are more comfortable with the 
                Guide Michelin or the McDonalds schools of language, we all know 
                that if we can’t master the language we can’t convey 
                the message. For nuclear communicators it’s rather difficult 
                to reduce concepts like transmutation, deep geological repositories 
                or isotope enrichment to a simple concept that anyone can understand. 
                Of course, there’s nothing new here. Science can often appear 
                complex to non-scientists. But surely this is one area where we 
                can and must improve if more people are to be made aware of and 
                appreciate the many advantages of nuclear energy. At a time when 
                the nuclear revival is in full flow, the premium on good communications 
                is all the greater; but so too are the rewards. The anti-nuclear 
                brigade is often very successful at using communications to influence 
                public opinion. Of course, we shouldn’t resort to exploiting 
                common fears and misconceptions like some of our opponents do, 
                but we can learn from them. We need to constantly upgrade our 
                communications skills and use them to emphasise the social, economic 
                and environmental benefits that nuclear energy brings; that’s 
                a language that everyone can understand. Frank Darwin, son of 
                Charles, once famously said: “In science the credit goes 
                to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea 
                first occurs.”  Ultimately it’s all about results-oriented 
                communications. There is little point in having something vitally 
                important to say if you can’t communicate it effectively. 
                Nuclear communicators from across the world gathered in Milan 
                from 11-15 February to focus on this and other central questions 
                at ENS’ flagship conference for nuclear communicators, PIME 
                2007. Scientists need to perfect the art of communications to 
                sell science to a wider and more eclectic, information-hungry 
                public. That’s the challenge. That’s the PIME message. 
                Never before has that message been so relevant. ENS NEWS N° 16 kicks off with a 
                piece from our President on the Jules Horowitz Research Reactor, 
                for which the foundation stone was recently laid in Cadarache, 
                France. Next up is an interesting and insightful contribution 
                from Andrew Teller on James Lovelock’s seminal work The 
                Revenge of Gaia.   Edition N°16 includes a bumper ENS Events 
                section that features recent and upcoming ENS events like PIME 
                2007 (there’s no escaping that key theme of communications), 
                RRFM/IGORR 2007, ENC 2007 and EYGF 2007. The continuing success 
                of these conferences reflect ENS’ significant role as international 
                conference organizer and catalyst for analysis and reflection 
                on the key scientific issues of the day.  The Member Societies and Corporate Members section 
                includes a number of reports and articles from France, Switzerland, 
                Romania, Sweden and Belgium. The subjects under the scientific 
                microscope include EDF’s “NICODEME” initiative 
                that offers research institutes – with financial help from 
                the European Commission – contracts to carry out advanced 
                work on nuclear safety; an award-winning doctoral thesis from 
                a Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) student on how artificial intelligence 
                can be applied to materials testing – an area of research 
                in which SCK-CEN in Mol (Belgium) excels; how a series of thematic 
                seminars (“Scientific and Technical Receptions”) organized 
                by our colleagues from the Swiss Nuclear Society have helped to 
                focus on key issues facing the nuclear science community; a drawing 
                competition for children and young people up to the age of 18 
                years old organized by the Romanian Nuclear Society and a detailed 
                analysis of the latest research into nuclear reactor control systems, 
                which the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm (Sweden) 
                has carried out.  There is also a distinctly youthful flavour 
                to this edition of ENS NEWS, with several reports from 
                Young Generation Nuclear chapters in Spain, the UK, the Netherlands 
                and Russia.   The recent 50th anniversary of the Euratom Treaty 
                provides plenty of food for thought for the EU Institutions section. 
                Our friends at FORATOM provide an in-depth analysis of the past, 
                present and future of the Treaty and a general statement on the 
                applicability and enduring relevance of the Treaty as it reaches 
                the venerable age of 50.   The ENS World News section goes Down Under to 
                feature a report on the second state-of-the-art neutron beam measuring 
                instrument developed by ANSTO in Australia - called, appropriately 
                enough, “Wombat.” It is used on a sample of opal to 
                assess how neutron beams penetrate and determine the material’s 
                atomic structure.   The ENS Members section completes the spring 
                edition of ENS NEWS.Enjoy the read and the unusually good spring weather!
 
                 
                  |  Mark O’Donovan
 Editor-in-Chief
 |   |    |