THREE BALTIC STATES SAY “YES” TO NUCLEAR
ENERGY
The following report by Jonas Gylys, President
of the Lithuanian Nuclear Energy Association and Stanislovas Ziedelis,
Secretary General of Lithuanian Nuclear Energy Association summarises
the recent energy history of the Baltic States, highlights the
ongoing EU energy policy debate and focuses on the future as expressed
collectively by the leaders of Lithaunia, Latvia and Estonia.
Striving to fulfil the EU’s accession requirements,
the Parliament of Lithuania decided to close the Ignalina NPP,
with its two RBMK-1500 type reactors. Fulfilment of the decision
started in December 31, 2004, when the first reactor at Ignalina
NPP was shut down. Then second reactor should be shut down at
the end of 2009. This closure will negatively affect the energy
sector of all the Baltic States.
In recent years, discussions at different levels
about the future energy options of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia
have continued to intensify. Several studies and research projects
concerning the analysis and forecasting of possible future changes
in power balance of Lithuania and entire Baltic region have been
carried out. The results can be summarised as follows:
-
Power reserves are decreasing, and the energy
balance has become negative in the most countries –
those neighbouring on Lithuania.
-
The power balance in the Lithuanian energy
system will become negative sometime between 2010 and 2020
and new bigger power generating capacity is needed if the
balance is to remain positive. New nuclear power plants or
combined-cycle gas turbine power plants could achieve this
purpose.
-
Lithuania’s energy supply system once
the Ignalina NPP is finally shut down will not comply with
the main security requirements and will be extremely vulnerable
due to lack of diversification of primary energy sources and
energy supply routes. Security of energy supply could be substantially
improved if new modern nuclear power plant were built.
These well-known arguments were further reinforced
by the important changes in the gas market that occurred in January
2006. A sudden jump in gas prices from GASPROM (about 40%, on
average, for Lithuania) and interruptions of the gas supply from
Russia to Ukraine and Georgia demonstrated that problem of security
of energy supply have becomes much more important than other considerations.
In order to coordinate future activities for
ensuring security of energy supply, a meeting between the Prime
Ministers of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was organized, in Trakai
(Lithuania), on February 27, 2006. Two official documents of great
importance to the Baltic States’ energy sector were signed
during the meeting – the “Declaration” and the
“Communiqué.”
In the Declaration it is stated the following:
-
referring to the forthcoming European Commission
Green Paper on Secure, Competitive and Sustainable Energy
for Europe and to the European Council in March 2006,
and welcoming the initiative of the Austrian Presidency regarding
the need to develop a new energy policy for Europe;
-
seeking to achieve the EU’s energy
objectives, especially with regard to its primary goal of
creating a safe, competitive and secure internal energy market;
-
taking into account the sensitive issue
of security of energy supply in the Baltic States and the
fact that the Baltic States do not have any gas and electricity
interconnections with other EU Member States, and therefore
do not have possibilities to participate in the internal energy
market;
-
considering the necessity to reduce the
dependency of the Baltic States on dominant outside suppliers
of energy and
-
bearing in mind that the closure of the
Ignalina NPP will have serious effects on the energy security
of the Baltic States;
Andrus Ansip, the Prime Minister of the Republic
of Estonia; Aigars Kalvitis, the Prime Minister of the Republic
of Latvia and Algirdas Brazauskas, Prime Minister of the Republic
of Lithuania:
-
Express their support to the development
of a common European energy policy as a guarantee to the security
of supply at the Community level;
-
State that the energy security problem that
affects the Baltic States should be addressed at EU level
and, therefore, request that the European Commission, by the
end of 2006, assesses the energy vulnerability of individual
Member States and EU regions in order to propose specific
actions - at the EU level - for reducing this vulnerability.
In order to integrate the Baltic States into the EU energy
market, it is necessary to define appropriate measures that
would diminish the existing fragmentation of the EU energy
market.
-
Consider that there is a need to integrate
the EU’s energy, external relations and security policies.
A harmonized EU external energy policy should be established
vis-à-vis third countries and organisations, notably
with Russia and the OPEC countries. The European Union should
speak to suppliers of energy in one strong voice. For example,
the Community and international instruments, such as G-8,
WTO, Energy Charter Treaty, should be effectively employed
to ensure the transparency of energy supply and the liberalisation
of energy markets.
-
Call for the development of an EU mechanism
that prepares for and ensures solidarity and assistance to
a country facing difficulties following damage to its essential
infrastructure or disruptions in energy supply. This includes
enhancing Europe’s gas stocks, inter alia
utilising the vast potential storage capacity of the Baltic
States to ensure against short-term supply disruptions to
the European Union.
-
State that while being in favour of a common
EU energy policy, the necessity to maintain national sovereignty
over the choice of primary energy sources and structure of
energy mix is paramount.
-
Call the European Commission and the Member
States to develop an action plan of immediate measures aimed
at enhancing EU energy security. Such an action plan should
be approved by the Council on the basis of the above mentioned
assessment of the European Commission.
After the meeting a Communiqué was signed.
In the Communiqué, the prime ministers of the three Baltic
States declared their collective action plan for launching concrete
short-term activities to promote energy security in the region.
The Communiqué outlines the aims of the action plan as
follows:
-
to work out a common energy strategy for the Baltic States
up until the end of 2006
-
to attempt to broaden the Baltic energy
market until 2009 and to harmonize standards in the Baltic
electricity market consistent with those applied in the Nordic
countries’ electricity market (Nordpool)
-
to support the construction of electricity
grid interconnections between Baltic states and the rest of
European Union, on the basis of full cooperation
-
to promote an initiative to build a new
NPP in Lithuania
-
to invite state-owned energy companies in
the three Baltic States to invest in the design and construction
of a new NPP in Lithuania on the basis of agreed terms and
conditions applicable to each party involved
-
to follow the principle of consensus for
all involved parties when inviting other companies to participate
in the project
-
to examine possibilities to erect terminals
for liquid gas and to develop gas storage capacities;
-
to examine the general conditions governing
the importing of electricity to the Baltic States from states
not included in the European economic space and the possibility
of parties involved in the new NPP construction project to
sign long-term contracts for the buying-selling of electricity
On the basis of the above-mentioned documents,
which were agreed by the Prime Ministers of Lithuania, Latvia
and Estonia respectively, the heads of the three Baltic national
energy providing companies - Lietuvos Energija AB, Eesti Energia
and Latvenergo - met in Ignalina, on March 8, 2006. Following
that meeting, they signed a Memorandum of Understanding on the
Preparation for Construction of a New Nuclear Reactor in Lithuania.
Mr. Karlis Mikelsons, chairman
of the Board Latvenergo, Mr. Sandor Liive, CEO of Eesti
Energia, and Mr. Rymantas Juozaitis, General Director of
Lietuvos Energija AB (from left to right) signing a Memorandum
of understanding on Preparation for Construction of a New
Nuclear Reactor in Lithuania
The Memorandum of Understanding states, that
the signatories will participate, in accordance with terms and
conditions applicable to all parties, in the project and will
contribute to its development. They will establish a Management
Committee that will be responsible for managing and supervising
the project and will delegate CEOs of all three energy companies
to join the committee. The parties will share equally all expenses
related to the common interests of the project. All signatories
of the Memorandum of Understanding agree that in order to reduce
dependence upon a single primary energy source, it is extremely
important to have diversified power generation portfolio. The
main issue to be solved is that of existing competition between
gas-fired power plants and other energy generating sources that
use other types of fuel. The parties of Memorandum of Understanding
have pointed out that certain know-how has already been acquired
with regards to the infrastructure required for building and operating
of an NPP in Lithuania. At the same time, power companies have
already developed skills needed to ensure successful cooperation.
With the signing this Memorandum of Understanding,
the three countries involved launched the first preparatory phase,
namely a feasibility study aimed at evaluating technological,
environmental, legal and economic aspects of the project. This
study will help all three countries to reach the most appropriate
mutual solution and ensure the promotion of adequate electricity
supplies throughout the region and the development of diversified
electricity generation sources for the future. The feasibility
study should be completed by November 1, 2006.
The parties will set up various working groups
to prepare the feasibility study, each one preparing a study of
its own. They will cover aspects such as technologies and environment,
project financing, legal issues and electricity transmission that
will.
The study prepared by the Working Group for Technologies
and Environmental Issues will tackle essential issues relating
to technology selection for the NPP and all related environmental
aspects, available technologies, equipment suppliers, possible
deadlines of the construction, fuel supply options and other factors
important for evaluation of power plant technologies. It will
also examine possible options for the disposal of radioactive
waste and their approximate costs, as well as evaluate a possible
location for the construction of the NPP.
The study prepared by the Working Group for Project
Financing will address certain project financing options and calculate
the primary economic and financial conditions that will need to
be fulfilled for the construction of a new NPP in Lithuania.
The study prepared by the Working Group for Legal
Issues will identify all the legal and regulatory preconditions
that will have to be met for the construction and operation of
the new NPP.
The study prepared by the Working Group for Electricity
Transmission will evaluate the existing capacity among Baltic
States for the transmission of electricity generated at the NPP
and, if necessary, the need for additional transmission capacity.
It will also evaluate options for reserves at the new NPP.
Once the project implementation feasibility study
has been completed, the parties will launch the development phase
of the project, unless the study results in critical obstacles
that are beyond the reasonable control of the parties or unless
conclusions are drawn that imply that the project is not economically
justifiable.
According to Mr. Rymantas Juozaitis, General
Director of Lietuvos Energija AB, “None of the parties alone
would be capable of providing sufficient investments in generation
sources that would allow the present market situation to be sustained.”
Mr. Karlis Mikelsons, chairman of the Board Latvenergo said: “This
should be considered as a future joint project involving Baltic
energy experts, as we have demonstrated successful cooperation
before with the Estlink energy transmission project. We have so
far only talked about replacing power capacity after the closure
of the Unit 2 of the Ignalina NPP, and yet this project concerns
the future development of energy for the Baltic Region. I would
like to point out that our energy supply should not only be economically
reasonable and perfect from a technical perspective. It should
also offer maximum safety. I am confident of finding up- to-date,
social, environmentally friendly and safe solutions”.
Mr. Sandor Liive, the CEO of Eesti Energia has
shown an interest before in participating in NPP development projects.
Speaking about how he felt that the agreement signed by the three
Baltic energy companies constituted a real opportunity, he added:
"The study we conducted in 2002 with Ministry of Economic
Affairs showed that for the purposes of diversifying generation
resources an NPP is one of the most seriously perceived options.
Based on the aforementioned study, it was clear that it is reasonable
to explore in depth the possibility of collaborative ventures
with Lithuania. As one of our closest neighbours and partners
Lithuania has the relevant infrastructure and experience."
The importance of ensuring energy supply independence
was underlined once more during meeting between the Presidents
of Lithuania and Poland on March 13, 2006. Valdas Adamkus, President
of Lithuania, invited Poland to join the three Baltic States in
preparing a project for the construction of a new NPP in Lithuania. |