Issue No. 21 Summer
(July 2008)

C O N T E N T S

ENS News
_______________

Word from the President

The case for nuclear energy is not solely linked to global warming

ENS Events
_______________

TOPSAFE 2008

NESTet 2008 - YGN Reporter

PIME 2009

RRFM 2009

Member Societies & Corporate Members
__________________

High Pressure - Boiling Water Reactor, HP-BWR

NUSIM 2008

MINA 2008

Why the Bulgarian Nuclear Society insist that the “small units” at Kozloduy NPP remain operational

Annual General Meeting of KTG and the German Atomic Forum takes place in Hamburg

UK Societies announce nuclear merger

The SNE magazine analyzes the results of the nuclear power plants in 2007

MYRRHA a new future for nuclear research

Spent fuel pool emptying, drainage and purging at EUREX Plant (Italy)

YGN Report
__________________

Nestet YGN Reporter

North American Young Generation at a Nuclear Congress in Chicago

European Institutions
___________________

Nuclear Forum working on roadmap for the development of nuclear in the EU

Nuclear Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance in the European Union

Position Paper on Nuclear Energy’s Contribution to a post-2012 Climate Policy

ENS World News
_______________

NucNet News

ENS Members
_______________

Links to ENS Member Societies

Links to ENS Corporate Members


Editorial staff
______________________

____________________

TOPSAFE 2008
30.9. - 3.10. 2008
in Dubrovnic, Croatia

____________________

PIME 2009
15 - 17 February 2009
in Edinburgh, UK

____________________

RRFM 2009
22.3. - 25.3.2009
in Vienna, Austria

____________________

 

 

Position Paper on Nuclear Energy’s Contribution to a post-2012 Climate Policy

In developing a post-2012 climate framework, it is essential to take into account the valuable contribution that nuclear energy makes to the avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions. Nuclear is therefore an important tool – among many – that can be used to reduce CO2 emissions. All available options, including nuclear energy, should be supported in the international effort to reduce the threat of global warming.

FORATOM, as the voice of the nuclear industry in Europe, makes the following main points in view of the upcoming discussions on a ‘post-2012’ international climate regime. FORATOM believes:

  • When addressing climate change, we encourage policy-makers to consider zero and low emitting electricity generating technologies, including nuclear energy.

  • The nuclear power sector can play an even greater role in greenhouse gas abatement through the construction of new nuclear plants, plant lifetime extensions and plant upgrades. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) believes that nuclear should continue to play an important role in the overall effort to curb greenhouse gas emissions in the decades to come1.

  • Nuclear energy should not be penalised in policy mechanisms designed to help address climate change, as it has been in CDM and JI projects and the EU’s Linking Directive. All technologies that can help fulfil the purpose of the CDM and JI, as defined in the protocol, should be eligible for use in those mechanisms.

  • The time frame of policy cycles concerning climate change do not coincide with that of the energy sector in which an investment decision is made on a mid- to long-term basis. Current obligations under the Kyoto Protocol and EU Emissions Trading Scheme are limited to the 2008-2012 period. The absence of certainty regarding future obligations after 2012 could create excessive commercial risks. A long-term view must be maintained.

  • If emissions trading is to be used as a policy measure to address climate change then emissions trading schemes must be structured in a way that provides the long-term certainty that will encourage the use of low carbon technologies, such as nuclear power, as emissions reduction options.

  • All countries have the sovereign right to determine their own development paths and technology needs. They should retain the freedom to choose nuclear as part of their development strategies, without their choices being constrained by an international agreement.

Nuclear Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance

The current use of nuclear energy (accounting for about 15% of the world’s electricity generation) avoids the emission of about 2.1 billion tonnes of CO2eq every year. In the EU as whole, the avoidance levels amount to 675 million tonnes of CO2eq per year, taking into account the current energy mix. By comparison, the EU has a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target of 446 million tonnes of CO2eq equivalent below 1990 level by 2008-2012. To make savings equivalent to those from the use of nuclear power, all passenger cars in the EU (212 million) would have to be taken off the roads.


Nuclear Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance
Source: IAEA (2000)

Ranges of total GHG emissions from different electricity production chains, expressed in grams of carbon equivalent per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. The ranges reflect differences in factors such as conversion efficiencies, local plant conditions, fuel transport requirements, the fuel mix assumed for electricity requirements related to plant construction and manufacturing equipment and the upstream components of the fuel cycle.

Furthermore, nuclear power plants generate electricity with hardly any emission of sulphur dioxide or nitrogen oxides, key agents for acid rain and photochemical air pollution. Thanks to nuclear, emissions of about 4.8 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide and 2.6 million tonnes of nitrogen oxides are avoided each year in the EU.

We need to build upon the current contribution of nuclear energy to meet our environmental objectives. We should maximise the utilisation of our existing nuclear capacity and build new nuclear power plants to meet the significant demand for new capacity that will occur over the next few decades.

Conclusion

Nuclear power makes a major contribution limiting the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations in the power generation sector, while facilitating access to abundant electricity at a stable and low cost. Any future climate change agreements and policies should establish a framework that enables the use of the nuclear generation option as part of the energy mix .


1 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) – Work Group III Report “Mitigation of Climate Change”.

 
Home l Top l Disclaimer l Copyright l Webmaster