| 

Romania:  Daniela Lulache, female leader of the nuclear industryThe organization of the ‘European  Nuclear Young Generation Forum’ (ENYGF)  next June in Paris is an opportunity for the SFEN Young Generation to make you  discover the actors of the European nuclear sector. Livia Chitu from the Romanian  Nuclear Young Generation interviewed Daniela Lulache, CEO of ‘Societatea  Nationala Nuclearelectrica’ (SNN), the company that owns Romania’s nuclear  reactors. Here is a written transcript of that interview: Could  you present yourself and your career?                 I  am Daniela Lulache. I am 48 years old and was born and raised in Romania. I am  an economist by profession, having graduated from the Bucharest Academy of  Economic Studies in 1993. I continued my career path in economics, mainly in  corporate finance and restructuring, structured financial products, brokerage  and strategic management, management of change and the principles of  communications.                 I  have held strategic top management positions over the years in both the private  and the state-owned sectors, which required a high level expertise in financial  management due to their inherent complexity.                 Before  being recruited for the position of General Manager of Nuclearelectrica in  2013, I occupied the position of Counselor of the Vice-Governor of the National  Bank of Romania, with responsibility for restructuring the contingency plan in the  event of commercial banks defaulting. Prior to this, I was General Manager and  President of the Board of Directors of Fondul Proprietatea (Property Fund),  managing the entire activity of the Fund (Euro 4 bill. investment fund)  including the start-up, the establishment of corporate structure and corporate  governance, the investment strategy design and implementation, and portfolio  management.                 I  also have a long experience in banking and financial consulting sectors.                 In  May of 2013, I was hired as Chief Executive Officer of Nuclearelectrica (the  only nuclear energy producer in Romania) as part of the Government’s strategy  to apply corporate governance to state-owned companies. As  Europe strivs to diversify its energy sources, reduce dependence on external  suppliers, and reduce fossil fuel emissions, what is the role that  Nuclearelectrica can play for Romania and for Europe?                 Romania is one of the few countries  that can ensure security of supply, diversity of energy sources while at the  same reducing dependency on external resources, which is already very low,  based entirely on its internal resources. Currently, the country has a  well-balanced energy mix comprising nuclear, hydro, coal, gas and renewables.  As European energy policy gives great emphasis to the reduction of CO2  emissions, with a level of 40% by 2030, the mix will most likely focus more on  those sources that able to meet decarbonisation standards. Technology  neutrality in meeting these standards will move investment strategies from the  one-source-fits-all approach in terms of decarbonization towards a more  balanced approach, incorporating all energy sources able to deliver the  expected results. Among these sources, nuclear energy is the most stable one,  with no need for back-up, no negative impact on the grid. It is also long-term  oriented and affordable for consumers.                 With its two operating units Nuclearelectrica  satisfies approximately 20% of Romania’s energy consumption needs. Whenever a country  has developed a complete nuclear fuel cycle, doubling the nuclear capacity is a  wise long-term investment that leads to a balanced choice in which source  diversity and technology neutrality play a significant role. In 10 years’ time nuclear  production will either replace obsolete coal-fired plants, or ensure the  long-term sustainability of the energy system. Of course, there is always room  for exports provided some changes are introduced into the legislation and  interconnecting capacities are further developed.  From  an environmental and a commercial point of view, how competitive is nuclear  energy in Romania, compared to other sources?                Very competitive! This is a clean  energy source that has no impact on the environment. With regards to  radioactive waste management, this is 100% safely controlled. I don’t know any  other industry whose safely is so strictly regulated and standardized, and  whose output satisfies so many energy system, long-term sustainability and  consumers’ needs. Nuclear production has one of the lowest production costs on  the market. Therefore, not only do we support environment protection, but also help  consumers. As regards nuclear new build, the construction of new units may be  cost intensive, but their operation is safe and profitable. All these factors  are integrated into the broader picture of security of supply, diversity and  decarbonization. I am personally not aware of any other resource that is so  stable, so predictable and so environment and consumer- friendly.   Romania  has ensured its energy independence with nuclear energy for years. Where does potential  growth for nuclear lie, given the post-Fukushima world?                Romania has been oriented  towards nuclear growth for some years now. Due to the impact of the financial  crisis the development of the two additional units of Cernavoda NPP has been  delayed. However, since August last year we have been actively involved in  following the steps outlined in the new governmental strategy for the  continuation of the two units. Currently, we are negotiating with the selected  investor a Memorandum of Understanding for the joint implementation of the  project, followed by the set-up of a new joint-venture (Project Company). Given  all these preliminary stages, the construction of the units can be initiated no  sooner than at least three years from now. Once the project is completed, a  doubling of the nuclear capacity will be achieved simultaneously with the  downsizing of the coal-based production. Romania has control of the complete  fuel cycle, the necessary expertise and a rich experience of operating the existing  two nuclear units at a very high level of nuclear safety. This was highlighted  by the results of the stress tests, so we meet all the conditions required for  advantageously increasing nuclear production.                  I think that Europe needs  nuclear if it wants to simultaneously address a series of challenges that have previously  been addressed on a case-by-case. A lot of market failures are solved by major  energy investment projects. As familiarity with investment is associated with  well-known conventional energy projects, we have to take a leap of faith and  move towards a new energy paradigm. If one wants different results, one has to  start applying different measures.   Nuclear  power has long-term potential. Opting for nuclear energy is a big decision that  implies massive fundraising. What are the  quantifiable effects of nuclear development? What can to be expected in return for  such a commitment, on both a national and continental scale?                 Let’s  resume the benefits of investing in nuclear industry as follows:                 Balance  of payments: Anything that  reduces imports is beneficial to national economies and is a safe-guard for  long-term and unimpeded development. We need guarantees for security of supply  and energy independence, as well as for energy source and price stability.                 Price  stability: The introduction  of an additional large-scale energy source into the mix provides additional price  stability.                  Security  of energy supply: an increase in  indigenous production (one of the EU desiderata),  coupled with low volumes of fuel, as is the case of nuclear, contribute  directly to security of supply.                   Employment: new build involves the creation of thousands of jobs both  directly and horizontally. Also, having lower electricity prices supports  competitiveness and growth, whereas, on the other hand, higher electricity  prices due to lack of the hedging effect of other sources could result in a  drop in employment and a reduction of GDP.                 Spin-off  effect: horizontal growth either in  the nuclear industry or in other industries. What  are Romania’s expectations from COP21 climate conference?                I expect an input of expertise on  how we can economically address climate change by fostering those industries  that can deliver quantifiable results. In order to have bio-sustainable  economies there’s a need to identify the innovative solutions that are able to  address such a strong paradigm change.   How  do you find the experience of being the first woman to hold the position of CEO  of a company like Nuclearelectrica?                The nuclear industry represents  a state-of-art technology, requires exceptional human resources, and complex  integrated management skills. So, it requires a management highly competent  management team. The top management of Nuclearelectrica consists of several  great professionals whose aim is to further develop the company and set it on a  constant path of growth. For such positions, it is irrelevant if you are a man  or woman.  It’s all about results.  Within  the framework of the European Nuclear Young  Generation Forum, what is the message that you would like to address to the  young professionals consodering working in this field?                The message is that this is  an industry like no other, which can give young professionals an amazing career  path and personal development opportunities. I strongly encourage them to  choose such a career as their professional lives will embark upon a very  dynamic journey full of challenges, motivation and satisfaction.    |